Top of the league and best site overall was Next (
www.next.co.uk). At the bottom of the table, representing the poorest site overall, was Diageo (
www.diageo.com).
For a copy of the full report, please email
FTSE_0305@sitemorse.com
Website Function
3 sites were error free this month and 15 sites had 10 errors or less. The site with the highest number of error occurrences was Wolseley (
www.wolseley.com) with over 10,000.
Website Compliance
Accessibility Compliance – results of automated testing against the mandatory requirements of Priority 1 (A) Accessibility: 8 sites scored 100%, 42 sites scored 90%+ and 9 sites achieved a score of less than 1%.
HTML – The site with the lowest number of warnings [HTML standards compliance within the requirements laid down by W3C and IETF] was Daily Mail General Trust (
www.dmgt.co.uk) with 2. Diageo (
www.diageo.com) had the poorest HTML with over 104,000 failures.
Website Performance
31 sites passed all basic speed tests, looking at first page download and simulated as being viewed by users home [56k] and ADSL [512k] access.
The site with the fastest response time was Emap (
www.emap.com); British American Tobacco (
www.bat.com) had the slowest response time, and was 162 times slower than Emap.
The site with the fastest download speed was Smith and Nephew (
www.smith-nephew.com); British American Tobacco (
www.bat.com) had the slowest download speed and was 139 times slower than Smith and Nephew.
Following sites were excluded;
www.antofagasta.co.uk
www.angloamerican.co.uk
www.bunzl.com
www.enterpriseinns.com
www.rolls-royce.com
For further details or to request interview please contact
Nicholas Le Seelleur
nickles@sitemorse.com
0870 759 3300
Login
