Weblinx Ltd are a search engine marketing company that structure websites so that they are search engine friendly
| reply to message » | post a new message » | e-mail to a friend » |
 |
Subject: | Generic emails as part of a broadcast list = spam/invalid? | |
|
|||
|
Author: | NeilWarren: view profile | all posts by this author | add to favourites | |
|
|||
|
Date: | 11:34:19 26 July 2008 | |
Has anyone got any further experience of sales@ and info@ email addresses forming part of a broadcast list? I have experience of using them successfully, especially when married to personalised subject lines and body copy, but have recently bumped into one outfit that is rejecting them (some, mind you, but not all e.g. sales.uk@...) out of hand saying they are "invalid" as far as their broadcast system is concerned. Seems like that would "invalidate" a major proportion of UK email lists to me, but I'd be interested in any other experiences and opinions.
Generic emails as part of a broadcast list = spam/invalid?, NeilWarren, 26 Jul 11:34.. Generic emails as part of a broadcast list = spam/invalid?, MarcMunier, 29 Jul 17:32outfit", we would be wary of a list with a large proportion of generic email addresses, marking them as invalid however is incorrect.
What matters ... Generic emails as part of a broadcast list = spam/invalid?, NeilWarren, 29 Jul 17:59 The only problem, as fate would have it, is that "outfit" does in fact refer to an agency working on behalf of a pretty ... Generic emails as part of a broadcast list = spam/invalid?, MarcMunier, 29 Jul 18:08munier@pure360.com
On 17:59:35 29 July 2008 NeilWarren wrote:
Thanks Marc
Th ...
PPC search engine marketing by Browser Media
Proactive hosting and
managed services provided by
Netstore Plc
