[ Sponsored Links ]

Advertise here »

Load testing

 
Rowan asks the right question:

It does depend on how you plan on load testing. If you are going to go the whole hog and simulate a variety of user scenarios performing different functions on the site

And from our experience (vested interest alarm: 50% of what we do is load testing: SciVisum ltd),

I'd suggest that this is kind of load testing is really the only type that makes sense.  It's all too common, for a company to do some 'simple' load testing in house; get some numbers that give them a false sense of security and then crash and burn as their site traffic goes up. 

It really does help the business, and the tech teams; to start off by defining the User Journeys that are the 'money making' vital routes on your site.

Then you can plan load testing to measure those: and the number you want is 'completed Journeys per second' for each journey.  (forget 'concurrent users' as a measure of traffic: concurrent users is not what your site is for! But to get users through the specific journeys).

With these kind of metrics, there's no risk of a false sense of security: because you're measuring the right thing.

The user journey/second figures  will be different for each journey (coz different things happen in the software/databases for each).

Once you know your Journey figures, you've then got hard data to show the bosses, in a language that they can understand! 

If any of the numbers are low: then you don't need to write a business case to justify work to fix it: the test results speak from themselves: and the decision whether to 'go with it as it is and take a flyer' or 'spend to fix it' : rightly rests with the management who hold the purse strings.

If you're planning to do a load test each month or more, then buying the pricey software tools and training up someone makes sense: otherwise it's way too expensive, and the software ends up as shelf-ware!

Performance specialists like us are often a more sensible way to go.

If you do go with consultants I would suggest http://www.acutest.co.uk/

Yup, they are good: not pure web testing folks like us though.  And if you want to talk to someone who just this month preferred us over them...

But whatever route you go: the more thinking you do round your choice of journeys, the more effective the project will be.

Hope this helps

Regards

Deri
www.scivisum.co.uk

 

 
  • Load testing, Craig_Elwell, 3 Jul 09:32
    Hi, Can anyone offer any advise re:load testing, typical cost etc. ...
    • Load testing, DenisK, 3 Jul 10:40
      Hi Craig, It very much depends on the platform you use.  Unless your website is too complicated I think load testing is something that you could do internally without any proble ...
      • Load testing, RowanHeasley, 4 Jul 08:01
        Hi Craig, It does depend on how you plan on load testing. If you are going to go the whole hog and simulate a variety of user scenarios performing different functions on the sit ...
        • Load testing, Craig_Elwell, 4 Jul 08:46
          Thanks for all your replies.... most helpful. ...
          • Load testing, SimonAustin, 4 Jul 09:24
            Hi Craig, Your account manager obviously hasn't spoke to you for a while ;-) Don't forget that we, Site Confidence, offer a very cost effective load testing service where we ...
        • Load testing, DeriJones, 4 Jul 13:36
          Rowan asks the right question: It does depend on how you plan on load testing. If you are going to go the whole hog and simulate a variety of user scenarios performing different ...
Subscribe for only €299