Its all about the timing... Discover how Pure puts your message in front of every recipient at the right time
Guava is a fresh thinking digital marketing agency specialising in SEO, PPC, and Web Development
Join the Live Demo and find out how Coremetrics can support ALL your online marketing
Want to know how to boost online sales in the run-up to Christmas? Register now
| reply to message » | post a new message » | e-mail to a friend » |
| Subject: | A/B Split Testing - Validity | ||
| Author: | bryjames: view profile | all posts by this author | add to favourites | ||
| Date: | 15:42:23 27 July 2006 | ||
On 15:34:13 27 July 2006 Aphillips wrote:
In a practical world of revenue targets, it can be difficult to always slow down long enough to stop and test and then carefully analyze your results. Understanding the validity of your data can help you to quickly make decisions and truly understand what a test is telling you.
Simply put, if you have a larger variance between two results, then you will need a smaller sample size to achieve a strong degree of confidence.
Imagine these are the results of a ficticious landing page optimization test:
Treatment
Unique Visits
Leads
Conversion
Landing Page A
4,203
32
0.76%
Landing Page B
3,454
534
15.46%
In this particular example, the difference between the number of leads is significant. Using our intuition, we can see that Landing Page B outperformed Landing Page A. However the sample size for Landing Page A Leads is still relatively small, so there is a high amount of room for error caused from sampling. There are obviously very complex algorithms for calculating the statistical relevance of a given data sample.
For a free tool for calculating validity:
Go to www.marketingexperiments.com/validity.html
A/B Split Testing - Validity, Aphillips, 27 Jul 15:34
A/B Split Testing - Validity, bryjames, 27 Jul 15:42
A/B Split Testing - Validity, danielb, 28 Jul 11:06