[ Sponsored Links ]

Advertise here »

RE: Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?

 

I'm not particularly convinced either.

Whilst I welcome new technologies that will allow us to interact in all sorts of clever ways there will always be demand for the unsophisticated. Google Search will remain a simple affair and the likes of Jakob Nielsen and Webcredible will continue to help websites become more effective/profitable y adopting 'keep it simple' strategies.

I also don't see my father, a man of 71, interacting with websites that behave more like desktop applications. All he is after is information that is easy to read.

Sure, Flickr and Writely rock. But they are hardly revolutionary. They were not around 4 years ago because broadband wasn't as widespread as it is now.

If anything, Web 2.0 is about bandwidth.

 
  • Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, Ashley , 6 Dec 10:52
    What do other people think about the so called "Web 2.0" Maybe I'm missing something but it seems to me to be in danger of becoming hyped dotcom-style when there are much more ...
    • Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, ianjindal, 6 Dec 15:31
      On 10:52:47 6 December 2005 Ashley wrote: Maybe I'm missing something but it seems to me to be in danger of becoming hyped dotcom-style when there are much more important, and ...
      • Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, MatthewTreagus, 8 Dec 10:43
        Users love interaction that they control. That's why digitial media works so well. These technologies and applications are another tool for building that interaction. Macromedia ...
        • RE: Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, Ashley , 14 Dec 17:20
          Take a look at (http://protopage.com/v2) Protopage - user control, AJAX, RSS. It's got Web 2.0 written all over it. No doubt some 'mashups' in there too somewhere (just trying out ...
          • RE: Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, Loz, 16 Dec 17:31
            I'm not particularly convinced either. Whilst I welcome new technologies that will allow us to interact in all sorts of clever ways there will always be demand for the unsophist ...
            • RE: Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, PaulWalsh, 16 Dec 18:04
              Loz, I agree with what you say. I also think there’s too much talk about the ‘solution’ and not enough talk about the use cases that justify changing anything. I was asked to c ...
    • Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, ilana, 6 Dec 16:19
      Oh, how cynical you are! (http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/) Jeff Jarvis wrote yesterday that "...distribution is not king. Content is not king. ...
    • Web 2.0 - setting dangerous expectations?, PaulWalsh, 12 Dec 03:52
      On 10:52:47 6 December 2005 Ashley wrote:  What do other people think about the so called "Web 2.0" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ...
Subscribe for only €299