1. John Wards

    Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net

    03 November 2004 15:16pm

    avatar

    I have to share this if you haven't seen it:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/americas/04/vote_usa/map/html/default.stm

    Its an impresive peice of technology, you can zoom in to see the votes for each state, it also promts you to update when it has new data, has historical data etc.

    Its on of the most useful things I have seen Flashed used for.

    I wish I programmed if!

  2. John Wards

    Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net

    03 November 2004 15:19pm

    avatar

    Oh my brain, i've probably missed more glaring errors...but that should be Flash and "programmed it"

    Excuse the spelling too, not enough caffine and no spell checker is my excuse ;-)

  3. Lazar Dzamic Silver

    Joint Planning Director at Kitcatt Nohr Alexander Shaw

    04 November 2004 10:35am

    lazar-dzamic.jpg

    Yes, quite a good one, we have commented on that over here in our offices too. Just shows that they still know how to pack a punch. They've could have made it a tad prettier, though...

    On 15:19:08 3 November 2004 John Wards wrote:
    >Oh my brain, i've probably missed more glaring
    >errors...but that should be Flash and "programmed
    >it"
    >
    >Excuse the spelling too, not enough caffine and no spell
    >checker is my excuse ;-)

  4. John Wards

    Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net

    04 November 2004 11:00am

    avatar

    Its functional, as a programmer would say!

  5. Lawrence Ladomery

    Web Consultant at architxt.net

    04 November 2004 11:03am

    DSC_00093.jpg

    Impressive animation, i agree. But what is the point of zooming in and out of states if you don't get more details? Why isn't each state divided up into counties?

    The only advantage of this animation is that you learn a little bit more about the US's geography. I didn't know, for example, that Wyoming is rectangular in shape.

    A much better version with much more content is CNN's version: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/

    I hope that the BBC dev's team recycled existing technolgies for this or else it was a rather expensive effort to display a limited amount of information.

    On 10:35:04 4 November 2004 lazar wrote:
    >Yes, quite a good one, we have commented on that over here
    >in our offices too. Just shows that they still know how to
    >pack a punch. They've could have made it a tad prettier,
    >though...
    >
    >On 15:19:08 3 November 2004 John Wards wrote:
    >>Oh my brain, i've probably missed more glaring
    >>errors...but that should be Flash and "programmed
    >>it"
    >>
    >>Excuse the spelling too, not enough caffine and no
    >spell
    >>checker is my excuse ;-)

  6. Lazar Dzamic Silver

    Joint Planning Director at Kitcatt Nohr Alexander Shaw

    04 November 2004 11:30am

    lazar-dzamic.jpg

    Good comments, although many of us are not that familiar with the USA geography, so it was of some use :).  Another effect it had on me was to focus my attention on the data from that particular state, so I take the zooming action as the visual cue to enhance the particularity of the data shown. But, as with anything else online, different tools work in a different way for different people.

    I agree on your comment on re-purposing the code, although I don't mind the public (read: mine) money to be used to kick the butt of the lazy and cost-driven commercial enterprises. That's what we pay for anyway, instead of needing to read the flat tables on the screen.

    As you see, I'm 'pro' BBC's licence renewal..:)

  7. Lawrence Ladomery

    Web Consultant at architxt.net

    04 November 2004 11:48am

    DSC_00093.jpg

    It would be interesting to carry out user testing of this solution, comparing results to the HTML version (which works much better for me).

    I think in this case people are not so much after learning about local geography or experiencing a cool animation as much as figuring out who won where - the stats.

    And there could be improvements too. There is no need to be able to zoom into the map as much as one is allowed, for example. All stuff that adds weight to the animation. Lets not forget that most people are still accessing the net on dial-up connections. How smooth would the animation be on 56K?

  8. Lazar Dzamic Silver

    Joint Planning Director at Kitcatt Nohr Alexander Shaw

    04 November 2004 11:54am

    lazar-dzamic.jpg

    Yes, that would be interesting. I guess that the thing would be much more jittery on 56k.

    On 11:48:42 4 November 2004 Loz wrote:

    It would be interesting to carry out user testing of this solution, comparing results to the HTML version (which works much better for me).

    I think in this case people are not so much after learning about local geography or experiencing a cool animation as much as figuring out who won where - the stats.

    And there could be improvements too. There is no need to be able to zoom into the map as much as one is allowed, for example. All stuff that adds weight to the animation. Lets not forget that most people are still accessing the net on dial-up connections. How smooth would the animation be on 56K?

Reply to this thread

Log in to reply to this discussion or join Econsultancy for free so you can post to our forums along with other benefits.