| reply to message » | post a new message » | e-mail to a friend » |
| Subject: | Spam stats | ||
| Author: | textor: view profile | all posts by this author | add to favourites | ||
| Date: | 10:02:36 21 July 2004 | ||
I analysed my email in the last 24 hours. I thought you guys and gals might be interested in my experience to benchmark your own. If anyone else has some stats to compare I would be very interested.
Spam caught by spamassassin: 420 (68%)
Spam subsequently cauught by Outlook 2003 59 (9%)
Bounced emails from people I never sent mail to: 45 (7%)
Spam manually removed by me: 39 (6%)
Genuine mail: 64 (10%)
Total: 627
I have spamassassin set to a warning limit of 5 which is fairly open, I don’t want to risk blocking genuine mail. Outlook 2003 seems to do a good job of finding spam, but when spamassassin went down last week I noticed the difference in my in-box so they are obviously picking up different mails.
The bounced emails are either viruses which have picked out my address in someones address book as a from address or spam which purports to come from my domain or one of the customers I am postmaster for.
http://www.appriver.com/ has real-time stats (including breakdown by type) and they are running about 80%
http://spamarrest.com/tryit/index.jsp shows it about 86%
http://www.brightmail.com/spamstats.html is around 66% only
Of course those are only the percentages blocked by those services.
Even dealing with only the last 6% manually it is not something I look forward to. Objectively with only 39 mails, at a max of 2 seconds each this is only a couple of minutes. Yet subjectively it seems to be a drain on my time.
As long as this continues I am OK with my automated tools. In fact with email address authentication - and assuming spamassassin/outlook knows about it, I would expect a much higher percentage to get picked up.
Bob
Textor
Spam stats, textor, 21 Jul 10:02