Showing posts 11 - 17 of 17
When to start to block the ad blockers?
Featured threads
Most viewed threads in last month
Econsultancy's new site 376 views
PPC Reporting Essentials 175 views
Convince me facebook is good for advertising! 154 views
Email - HTML issues in Outlook 2007 and when to send? 146 views
SEO Title characters 143 views
Most active threads in last month
Econsultancy's new site 11 replies
SEO Title characters 9 replies
.de vs. page on current website 5 replies
PPC Reporting Essentials 4 replies
Email - HTML issues in Outlook 2007 and when to send? 3 replies
Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net
17 June 2004 12:27pm
I'm with you I don't want to annoy my users with overlays and pop-ups.
But blocking adverts that are not relevant to you is a hard job, your happy with AdWords because they show related ads but do they all the time? For example your a supporter of team X and your reading a match report about team Y vs. team X. Google will show adverts for both teams from say the BBC or Ebay. 50% relevant which is better I suppose.
But as a content owner why would I want to advertise the BBC? When your watching the football on ITV you don't get an advert to watch it on the BBC, its relevant but it woudn;t happen.
You do get adverts for Cars, football boots, beer. Not really relevant to the content you have been watching.
Why should publishers online only take adverts that are relevant to the content like adwords provide should they not be relevant to the general user base?
My user profiling tells me that my users are mostly males with 30k+ they are interested in cars, dating, shopping online, betting. Just the type of advert I show.
Users are not blocking adverts because they are not relevant to them they are blocking adverts because they annoy them, for this I lay the blame at the door of the agencies. OK I shouldn't take the annoying adverts...I do try and kep them to a minimum its an addiction you know ;-).....
You are right though I should not be over reliant on advertising revenue but after many ideas and many hours its the only revenue stream for my type of site.
Unless you have a better suggestion I am stuck with adverts for now.
John
Fndr at Majestic12.co.uk
17 June 2004 13:01pm
On 12:27:11 17 June 2004 John Wards wrote:
>But blocking adverts that are not relevant to you is a
>hard job, your happy with AdWords because they show
>related ads but do they all the time?
I think they show relevant stuff most of time, or users dont click on them
which would force those irrelevant (as measured by perception of users)
to drop. This is a nice self-managing model.
>You do get adverts for Cars, football boots, beer. Not
>really relevant to the content you have been watching.
This is true - but its also true that TV ads nowadays are more
of a branding exercise rather than sales one - people
switch off but might remember some funny ad that related to
company X.
>Why should publishers online only take adverts that are
>relevant to the content like adwords provide should they
>not be relevant to the general user base?
Well, if its not relevant then in my view its useless - waste
of money for advertiser in the first place as a tactical issue,
and strategically worse standing towards on ALL ads (even relevant)
for the publisher.
>My user profiling tells me that my users are mostly males
>with 30k+ they are interested in cars, dating, shopping
>online, betting. Just the type of advert I show.
These categories are too general - I like _SPECIFIC_ cars, not
all cars - ie I am not big fanatic of ANYTHING related to cars, but
specific models will ring bell in my head very nicely.
This is why I think that Google's AdSense got a better chance in it -
they have a chance to achieve much finer granularity. Just wait till
it is possible to pass user preferences to AdSense so they could track
and provide relevant experience across all sites that use AdSense.
>Users are not blocking adverts because they are not
>relevant to them they are blocking adverts because they
>annoy them, for this I lay the blame at the door of the
>agencies.
I agree - problem of relevancy is instrumental to agency's behaviour -
their previous irrelevant ads stopped getting clicks, so they go for
annoying factor instead of trying to fix the relevancy issue, which is
of course is not easy to do for them!
>Unless you have a better suggestion I am stuck with
>adverts for now.
Well I think your business is doomed and you are better off selling
me 99% stake for £10, and I will show you true potential of it - you
will still keep 1% to benefit from my wisdom ;-)
regards,
Alex
Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net
17 June 2004 13:44pm
>This is true - but its also true that TV ads nowadays are
>more
>of a branding exercise rather than sales one - people
>switch off but might remember some funny ad that related
>to
>company X.
Why can this not be true for online? See my other post which covers this topic :-)
>
>These categories are too general - I like _SPECIFIC_ cars,
>not
>all cars - ie I am not big fanatic of ANYTHING related to
>cars, but
>specific models will ring bell in my head very nicely.
But unless a use gives me in depth profile information and I am able to tie that into an adserver that is impossible to so. And I know that 90% of my users won't bother.
>I agree - problem of relevancy is instrumental to agency's
>behaviour -
>their previous irrelevant ads stopped getting clicks, so
>they go for
>annoying factor instead of trying to fix the relevancy
>issue, which is
>of course is not easy to do for them!
Why should clicks be the mesurement for a sucessful campain? You don't expect someone watching tv to stop what they are doing and go and buy a product...its branding and product awareness that advertising is about.
>>Unless you have a better suggestion I am stuck with
>>adverts for now.
>
>Well I think your business is doomed and you are better
>off selling
>me 99% stake for £10, and I will show you true
>potential of it - you
>will still keep 1% to benefit from my wisdom ;-)
Thanks but no thanks ;-). My site costs about £200 a month to run so I can waid it out if the market does change and then follow in that direction.
Cheers
John
Fndr at Majestic12.co.uk
17 June 2004 13:53pm
On 13:44:43 17 June 2004 John Wards wrote:
>Why can this not be true for online? See my other post which covers this topic :-)
Because online is not the same as TV or newspapers - different expectations, plus
people got USED and in a way accepted (reluctantly that is) ads in old mediums,
and to top it up there were no effective means to avoid those, this is slowly changing
with TIVO.
>But unless a use gives me in depth profile information and
>I am able to tie that into an adserver that is impossible
>to so. And I know that 90% of my users won't bother.
True, but Google can leverage its effective monopoly on search by remembering types of things a particular person was looking for and using this self-built profile to deliver more personalised ads. I think this might actually work, bar privacy backlash which will most certainly follow.
>Why should clicks be the mesurement for a sucessful
>campain? You don't expect someone watching tv to stop what
>they are doing and go and buy a product...its branding and
>product awareness that advertising is about.
I am wary of clicks just like I am ware of impressions - personally my view is that ROI is the only right way to measure campaign - it either losing money or making them.
>Thanks but no thanks ;-). My site costs about £200 a
>month to run so I can waid it out if the market does
>change and then follow in that direction.
ok, but don't say that I did not suggest you anything ;-)
cheers
Alex
Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net
17 June 2004 14:12pm
I would love to get figures from advertisers on ROI but I never do. All I know is if they rebook it must be working.
For example last year a betting company advertised with us for 12 months in a row. They had some of the worsth click through rates we'd ever had because they we're doing 50-100,000 page imps a day, but they would come back month after month. I am guessing we must have given them a good ROI.
I also think a banner should and could be very effective in being memorable I have never seen any one try it.
I would be more than willing to test such things out on my site but all I get is the bog standard boring ani-gifs and flash.
A game built into a banner is a simple but effective branding exersise, no need for the user to leave the site (because why would he, hes just arived!) have a quick shot and get on with his business. But I can not remember the last time I saw one of those. Is this becasue they are too expensive to make? If so someone is charging too much and shoting themselves in the foot...or maybe they don't work I dunno.
Any way back on topic...I'd still like to remove users from my network who are blocking adverts....;-)
John
Fndr at Majestic12.co.uk
17 June 2004 15:05pm
On 14:12:03 17 June 2004 John Wards wrote:
>I would love to get figures from advertisers on ROI but I
>never do. All I know is if they rebook it must be working.
Just because they continue doing the same thing does
not mean its the right thing to do ;-)
>For example last year a betting company advertised with us
>for 12 months in a row. I am guessing we must have
> given them a good ROI.
My guess would be that the person in charge left and new
person reviewed all contracts ;-)
>Any way back on topic...I'd still like to remove users
>from my network who are blocking adverts....;-)
good luck - you will need it!
alex
Multi Media Developer at SportNetwork.net
17 June 2004 15:20pm
I know that this betting company looked at sign-ups and betting turn over before deciding on what sites to rebook with.
We're now with a new agency who have yet to get a deal with them that we are happy with, the agency had a standing CPC deal when we joined which I am not interested in. We are in negotiations :-)
The last bit was said in jest of course but you have got me thinking about other means of generating revenue from users.
We use intelli text which is a simmilar thing to google adsense but it reads content for keywords and turns them into links. Have yet to get a revenue report to see how sucess full it has been (its due in today so I might nag them) but I know we we're geting double the number of clicks we get on graphical adverts on a third less pages.
John